Did you know...
If facebook were a country, it would be the third largest in the world?
There are over 12 billion searches performed on google each month?
The number of text messages sent and received daily now exceeds the total population of the human planet?
Now that you know, how will you let it inform your teaching? One youtube video entitled
Pay Attention suggests having students text individuals outside their school to gather data for the class to use in lessons on topics like graphing, food preparation, and economic trends. Since we live in an age of digital learners, this video argues, why not use the technology our students love to engage our students and teach them more effectively? Another thought provoking video,
Did You Know? calls attention to the rapid technological change going on in the world today and points to the need to prepare students for jobs that don't yet exist and that will utilize technologies that haven't yet been invented.
I appreciate the arguments these videos make about the urgency of incorporating technology in the twenty-first century classroom in a way that is relevant and engaging. Yet there is also a part of me that isn't fully convinced of the feasibility of their argument given the population of students I'm likely to work with.
Technology can be extremely expensive. If Buffalo private schools like
Elmwood Franklin, where most of the students are middle class and Caucasian, can afford to put
ipads
into the hands of all their students, this is hardly the case in most
of the schools attended by children of color on Buffalo's East and West
Sides. Rather, in many of these classrooms, teachers have to reach into
their own pockets just to purchase basic classroom supplies, not to
speak of expensive technology. The students in these mostly low-income neighborhoods, and especially those who are recent immigrants and
refugees may not have personal cell phones, ipods, or internet access at home, as these videos seems to suggest every teenager today does. It makes me wonder whether technology is
just another area which will continue to accentuate the gap between the
"haves" and the "have nots" in our society.
I also wonder whether catering to our students' 24/7 connection to technology is all good. In a
speech given at the RSA, Sir Ken Robinson makes the following statement, "Our children are living in the most intensely stimulating period in the
history of the earth. They're being besieged with information and calls
to their attention from every platform; computers, iphones, advertisements, and hundreds of television channels. And we're penalizing them for getting distracted..."

If anything, this statement makes me wonder whether many kids (and adults!) today haven't developed an unhealthy addiction or over-dependance on technology. If our constant exposure to technology makes it difficult for us to commit to and focus on a single task, or results in us being disconnected from what's happening around us in the here and now, is that really a good thing? I can't tell you how many individuals I've talked to who've commented on the fact that while we now have the capacity to build larger and larger electronic social networks, many of us seem to be losing touch with the people immediately present around us, who we interact with in our daily lives. After all, how many of us have tried to carry on a conversation with someone only to have them be texting or checking facebook on their iphone the entire time they're talking to us.
Yes, technology provides students with some incredible possibilities for learning and connection, but perhaps this should be tempered with fostering healthy relationships and connections with the "flesh and blood" individuals who inhabit their physical lives. Maybe in this age of over-digitalization part of our role as instructors should be not only to help students use technology as a tool for learning, but also to help them "unplug" and relearn how to engage in healthy, non-digital interactions.